Discussion about this post

User's avatar
David Lenander's avatar

The movie may or may not get the feel of things right, but an awful lot of details aren't correct. Did the Newport audience object to Dylan going electric? There may have been some objectors, but they were vastly outweighed by the fans who had no problem with the electrified tracks on _Bringing It All Back Home_, or the new hit single, or the earlier electrified set by the Fariñas, or the many bands that had already played the festival, like the Butterfield Blues Band. And other, mostly blues bands. The fight Alan Lomax was in wasn't over electrification, and it was a day or two earlier, it was because an electric blues band was fronted by white guys, and he felt that they were stealing African American music. Nothing to do with Dylan. Pete Seeger repeatedly denied that he objected to electrified music--though not his preference--but he felt that "Maggie's Farm" was a great song and the sound was so bad that no one could make out the words, and his remark "If I had an axe, I'd cut the cables," was not a serious proposition. Sylvia Tyson said everyone in the folk community was intensely interested in this new avenue or approach to their music, and that people were booing--only later in the set, which she said was poorly rehearsed and badly amplified--they really didn't know how to amplify things very well, yet--"the dog's breakfast," she called the sound of it, but mainly the booing was over Dylan leaving the stage after only 3 songs. Some people had been waiting for his set for most of the day. Albert Grossman apparently thought that the controversy was something to be exploited, to make Dylan look like a revolutionary and get more media attention. Nobody yelled "Judas" at the Newport set, that came more than a year later, when it became a thing for a--hole guys to follow the concert around and heckle Dylan and his band. (Any chance they were paid something by Grossman?).

Expand full comment

No posts